
The reasons why Labour are sinking are well rehearsed, and doesn't bear repeating. But the steady evaporation of the party under Keir Starmer is a problem. Labourism from its earliest manifestations was always a means of reconciling the organised working class with the social order, of aligning the industrial incrementalism of trade union struggle with the coalition-building and proceduralism of constitutional politics. It was and, in its best moments, remains less a moral crusade and more a means of integrating the working class into the politics and (sensible) management of British capitalism. For it to do this, Labour needs to keep its base among the popular layers. However, it's been evident since Starmer became party leader that he either does not understand this or doesn't care. Because his approach to politics is both managerialist and obsequiously deferential to business, above all the City. Yet hollowing out the party before it even took office is to undermine Labour and Labourism's utility to British capital. Apart from its hyper class conscious and, therefore, paranoid elements, capital likes Labour because of its historic role in dampening down aspirations and movements from below. They appreciate Rachel Reeves's orthodox approach to state finances, but that's a nice to have. Labour is supposed to manage and police the class relations of British capitalism for capital's benefit from within the organised workers' movement. Something it cannot do if the mass support has vanished and has gone, in the main, to a radical upstart.
This is where the hysteria seen across the Tory press since Thursday's result comes in. It has been occasionally noted that the collapse of the Tories hasn't occasioned much soul searching or panic on the right. The reason being that Reform are available to articulate the interests that have hitherto animated the Conservatives, and that despite occasional argy-bargy between Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch, it's clear that should the situation demand some kind of electoral arrangement or governing coalition deal could be struck. With Reform leading the polls, the right are intensely relaxed about the vestigal status of the Tories. But, having driven all before it, if they weren't expecting Reform to win in Manchester they too believed the polls about how close the contest was. Instead they were handily seen off. This shouldn't be too much of a concern considering the character of the constituency, but have inhaled their own fumes. They - like the Labour right - caricature the working class as racists moved by the same oddball concerns as they. Having had their reality impinged upon, and seeing green left populism crowding out their tired old shtick, all of a sudden they're worried. Farage's cache is anti-political establishment, of being the "change" candidate. That the Greens have successfully contested these claims on one occasion, the right are now worried that they were getting high on their supply, and that we could be back in 2017 again. A fear reinforced by Reform's stalling in most national polls.
Here then is the problem. Labour are no longer suitable as a vehicle for mass politics, and therefore cannot be a reliable pacifier. Meanwhile, the great white hope of the right is not as popular as they thought it was. Centrism is, once again, a dead letter. And the right might not be strong enough to win an election, be it a Reform government or a coalition with the Tories. At the same time, as far as both parties are concerned the insurgent Green Party has come from nowhere and threatens to drag politics as a whole into confrontation with property, work, income, living standards, and why the rich have prospered at everyone else's expense. I.e. The class concerns politics normally works hard to obfuscate, smother, and deny. It follows that the press will try everything to shove hope back in its box - character assassinations, gossip mongering, smears, scare mongering, whipping up new scapegoat campaigns. But ultimately, these efforts are doomed. Since the final defeat of Corbynism in 2019, the Tories, Reform, and especially Labour have done everything possible to keep the left out of politics. And yet here we are - the Greens are becoming the new vehicle for working class interests and is mounting a renewed challenge to the establishment's class compact. No wonder so many of them are panicked.
17 comments:
Hang on, how do we know the efforts of the press are doomed?
Are you saying that we are inoculated because we saw it all with Corbyn? Is it because the press are not widely read? Is it because Their readership is dying out?
I hope that the greens are ready for the shit that is coming their way. If any of them are reading, the French left took note of what happened to Corbyn and their strategy appears to concede and not back down. They attack at every opportunity, reminding audiences of whose interests the press serve.
I've literally seen Zack and several others say "we need to be ready".
They know what's coming, and so far they've been hitting back. (To the point of literally taking Telegraph headlines and republishing them as an endorsement).
I used to have an op ed piece by Nigel Lawson from the early 1970's. He was complaining that the LP was failing to recruit the new wave of left activism and neuter it,which was it's main role in politicd.
I agree with Towerbridge. I don't see any reason to expect the press's demolition of Polanski or the Greens to fail. When they go for the jugular they always get there in the end. I hope I'm not right. I notice also the Facebook monsters are gunning for him too, with fake accounts spending big money on paid-for posts attacking him. I last saw this when Corbyn was on the rise. I thought it was so crass it couldn't possibly work. I was wrong.
A lot of good points made , Phil....... But , ahem, it might seem vulgar to mention this in this always very UK-focussed blog, but the ongoing, ever - expanding Middle East war , with petrol and gas prices soon to go through the roof, and the global economy thrown into crisis, is surely worth a mention as a huge emerging destructive reality for UK, and indeed European, politics.
Our friend Zak Polanski may well soon have to revisit his recent opportunist affirmation of support for NATO, as it , particularly with UK airbase provision , assists in the mass killings of Iranian civilians, certainly if he is to retain support in our Muslim communities - which if done, will bring down a cascade of abuse from our msm.
The polls suggest a right wing government of some kind. On the left there looks like a mosaic - SNP with seats40+, PC with 20 or so, Greens with (who wants to hazard a guess 40 or 50), various independents and Sinn Fein with 12, on the 'respectable right' Lib Dems with 80 and the less respectable righ rump of Labour with ??
And while we can all celebrate the collapse of New Labour with its contemptous indifference towards voters and party members we will face an unstable, chaotic period of right wing government full of aggressively over-confident rightists hostile to democracy playing the Trump tribute act suitaly tailored ffor Lilliput Britain.
The fact that the Greens MPs, leader and councillors have better human qualities than Labour's mean, insipid and careerist MPs does not mean that voters will get behind them in sufficient numbers for them to lead the country. Labour was formed in 1906, it took till 1945 for them to form a majority government.
I don't see The Green Party dragging society into a confrontation with property, work, income, living standards etc, not in any way that engages with empirical reality. I haven't seen a single policy that meaningfully addresses the UK's underlying economic problems. I've seen plenty of populism, and some canny tactical nous, which is definitely driving momentum. I still maintain the Greens do not represent the interests of the class that actually works, but they're pushing Labour out of certain cohorts it's usually strong in; the Metropolitan left-Liberal Fabian types, some culture warriors/SJWs who are naturally attracted to 'causes', and most importantly the large client base of lumpenproletariat (anachronistically referred to as 'working class'). To get mass appeal the Boob Whisperer has to avoid Corbyn's problem, the majority of British citizens need to trust him that when push comes to shove he'll put their interests above the 'causes' that provide his hardcore support.
As Mike points out, it's on new(er) media where the battle will really be fought.
A lot depends upon the ability of the greens' newfound supporters to recognise relatively sophisticated manipulation by astroturfing, narrative control, and microtargeting. And also on the depth of disgust with the other parties that has driven them to the greens in the first place - the deeper that is, the tougher they will be for vested capital to influence (and we can probably assume that it's quite deep by now!)
Given wider current affairs, probably the best place for the establishment to attack the greens will be on fears about defence. Zack will have to be careful to strike an anti-war stance whilst both promising improvements to living standards, and promising NOT to raid the defence budget to fund them. If he needs to promise "wealth taxes" instead, then so be it - the indignant screams of establishment economists probably won't resonate well with people who can see the economic sharp end; and the standard "well, we'll just sod off to live tax-free in Dubai then" argument will be a gift when everyone can remember Iranian bombs raining down upon it, and the likes of Tice and Oakeshott wailing to be evacuated.
The moment of greatest hope that we can look forward to will also be the peak of the danger. Ultimately, if the greens stay in the game, the right wing will throw absolutely everything they have - possibly including actual electoral fraud - into an attempt to get Reform over the line by any means possible. And if that succeeds, then the democratic institutions which allowed an upstart party to threaten them in the first place will begin to be rapidly hollowed out and/or dismantled, so that they can never be challenged again. A repeat of what happened within the Labour Party following 2019, but this time on the national level. Almost needless to say that if the Trumpists are still in control of Washington at that time then we will be unceremoniously sold to them.
For clarity, when you say 'coming after Zack Polanski', are you referring to asking him whether he stands with his deputy Mothin Ali and supports the Islamic regime in Iran and its massacring of thousands of Iranians?
Isn't it the job of the press to ask awkward questions?
Incredibly still seeing some on the left saying the capitalist media is promoting Zack Polanski and the Greens because we are no threat. Its dogma and a good bit of jealously. We are the real left threat.
Could you give me a link to Mr Ali stating support for the Iranian regime please? I have not seen it despite a trawl of the press. Or are youjust illustrating the type of attach that the Greens can expect - no factual basis but a play on prejudices around leftist Muslim politicians?
Dearie me , Anonymous 11.48, your ignorant trollery here assumes no-one reading this blog has failed to learn from ample , credible, non MSM sources, that the supposed heavily armed "uprising" in Iran was carefully arranged by the US and Israel, and MI6, via 100,00 smuggled in Starlink terminals to organise it moment by moment . The figure of 30,000 dead "demonstrators" is a figure entirely concocted by the western mass media, with no basis in reality. Maybe you should read the Al Jazeera (no friend of Iran) detail report on the deliberate mass murder by Israeli missiles of circa 170 Iranian schoolgirls a few days ago , and grasp the sheer illegality of the joint US/Israeli unprovoked attack on Iran before vomiting out pure propaganda.
The global economy is about to go into profound freefall as the Middle East war continues to spread and oil and gas supplies globally crash (and the Russians cut off remaining oil and gas supplies to Europe at months end) . We are on the cusp of profound political crisis across Europe very soon. The Greens will undoubtedly not be able to stand up against a massive wall of hostile MSM propaganda and state intimidation. They will undoubtedly step back into line under the con artist born again Leftie , Zak Polanski soon as very authoritarian measures will no doubt be taken to ensure the suicidal warmongering trajectory of all European states (apart from Ireland and Spain) continues .
I see our reactionary-in-residence, Kamo, is back with a new collection of words to join together. This time its taken them from its personal "urrg" file - "Metropolitan", "left-Liberal", "Fabian", "lumpenproletariat" (get you!) added in some from the "appropriated" file, "Culture Warrior" and a new fave of the alt-right pseudo-intellectual, "SJW". Which is apparently meant to be pejorative - a more specific category of Woke. Yet again proving the fascination proto-fascists have for people who take an interest in social justice. It's as if they just can't comprehend why anyone would care about anything other than maximising their utility as an individual. After all, there is no such thing as society, right (or, alt-right)?
"Naturally attracted to causes" is presented as a peculiar genetic trait, unique to Kamo's opponents. Fortunately Kamo doesn't suffer from it - despite being irresistably drawn to the cause of commenting on almost every post that Phil makes. Not because it is naturally attracted to the cause of disparaging the Left, obviously! There is in fact a rational explanation...err...
As always, it can't help revealing its true beliefs, - "the class that actually works". Meaning, of course, the class that it belongs to. The only class that should rule, and breed, and express opinions.
'SJW' is actually a very old epithet, dating from the 2014-17 era of reactionary and anti-feminist YouTube. It has, if anything, largely fallen into disuse, having been supplanted by 'woke' as the online reactionary's pejorative de rigueur.
It's so old it has come back into fashion again, like flares.
This guy's campaign team are putting stuff out again:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/the-ex-special-forces-colonel-tipped-as-future-pm-4226145
What future for young people who do not have family that can give them some money towards a house, and who have a large student debt even if they worked when they were a student. Are they going to have a family and prosper for the country? Many young people are in this situation.
The NHS is not providing the level of care that it could for young and old.
We could be a top skills and educated country, that has high quality, health, eduation and housing for all.
So what is the plan? The 10, 15 and 20 year plan for the people in the UK. The strategy to develop this over the next decade. Or is this the end, the decline...?
Post a Comment