Wednesday 5 January 2022

Scapegoating the Unvaccinated

Unless they have dispensations for medical reasons, Tony Blair thinks they're idiots. Emmanuel Macron wants to "piss them off" and carry on doing so until the pandemic ends. And Boris Johnson mumbled something uncomprehendingly negative about them at Tuesday's Covid press conference. At home and overseas, we're seeing hints of a new biopolitical strategy: making the unvaccinated scapegoats for our present difficulties. And from the standpoint of our Tory government, it's the logical culmination of the politics of the pandemic they've peddled for two years.

As recently argued, prioritising public health sits in tension with received statecraft and governance that has prevailed these last 40 years. The messaging pushed by medicine and heeded by millions of people was to act as if they themselves were infected. I protect you and you protect me. If everyone acted in the same way, then transmission would not happen as easily. To put it another way, conduct was to be other-focused as opposed to self-interested. And this advice undoubtedly prevented hundreds of thousands of infections from taking place, and with it tens of thousands of cases of serious illness and death. But we can't well have a germ of solidaristic behaviour taking root, no matter how many times the Tories and their press helpers heralded the Blitz spirit.

I don't intend to go through everything the Tories have done since, except to note they have struggled (and largely succeeded) in reversing the axis of public health messaging. As time went on restrictions were portrayed as overly burdensome, even if they were something as simple as wearing a mask. Freedom days came and went, the middle class were encouraged to eat out, plans were afoot to enforce a mass return to work ... and then another two lockdowns, more restrictions, and then none again. Refusing to fix the roof when the sun was shining, to borrow a favourite phrase of a former Tory PM, the much-hyped freedoms were merely moments in which the virus could circulate at lower rates while the Tories didn't do anything to prepare for a winter wave nor a more infectious variant. Amid the incoherence and the refusal to intervene until it was too late, public health became more a matter of personal responsibility. Which suits the Tories down to the ground. Catching Covid wasn't their fault - contracting it is either hard luck or not taking the necessary precautions. You are the master of your own health, again.

Summer 2020 was when we saw a first overt push using public health as a new tool of divide and rule. Suddenly the press were awash with stories about young people having parties in contravention of the rules, and raves taking place deep in the woods that were a bit laissez-faire on social distancing. Less hands, face, space, more Everybody In The Place.. The broadcast news showed heat vision police footage to whip up concern. The yoof, always a potentially dangerous cast of characters in the right wing imaginary, were now responsible for keeping Covid going because they were flouting the regs. The numbers appeared to show it - infections among the youngest adult age brackets showed stubbornly higher rates than the general population. What didn't receive attention was the real reason why the young were disproportionately affected: because many of them had returned to work in hospitality and were therefore getting it and transmitting it in the workplace. It wasn't parties but the monomaniacal Tory obsession with forcing people back into work. Johnson, Sunak and co were Covid's useful idiots, not young people themselves. This angle of Covid scapegoating did not last long: it was hard to maintain the pretence when children were drummed back to school and further and higher education reopened, handily helping distribute the disease.

Now, time is increasingly ripe for another round of scapegoating. With the Tories on the ropes and Johnson's authority imperilled, if not now, when? The ground appears fertile for such a strategy. Early last month, YouGov found clear majorities among all age groups and political persuasions for bans on the unvaccinated going into "non-essential" shops and attending indoor events. Already, there is an identifiable 'out' population who, thanks to media coverage, are associated with the fringe idiocy of the anti-vax/Covid-denialist movement. If they're targeted, it's not terribly likely the wider population would listen to their concerns with a sympathetic ear. Second, with all the information available and demonstrable lower risk of illness from the vaccine than catching Covid, refusing the jabs marks one out as selfish and uninterested in keeping others safe. They've turned their nose up at the collective sacrifice made and seem to think being potential bed blockers in our overstretched hospitals won't happen to them. As crass as Macron's comments were, there are plenty on these shores who would lap them up. One should never underestimate the collective desire to give unworthy others a bit of a slap.

We should not forget about the politics of this, though. If the Tories go down this road it's not because they want to see people fit and healthy. Their seeming indifference/herd immunity approach to letting Omicron tear through schools and workplaces should put that notion to bed. Using the unvaccinated as scapegoats gets them off the hook. The lack of business support, pitiful sick pay, no meaningful health measures except for wearing a mask, the cavalcade of failures, their prioritising of their class interests can be memory holed and depoliticised if our prolonged health crisis is pinned on Piers Corbyn and his ilk. The Tories are past masters at the politics of divide and rule. Keep an eye out for it.

Image Credit

5 comments:

Dr Zoltan Jorovic said...

As so often in life, this isn't a binary situation and you are mistaken to suggest it is. Yes the Tory govt has mismanaged the pandemic, but also, yes those who refuse to get vaccinated for no reason other than some weird idea that it involves submission to a conspiracy are idiots and are putting their personal wishes above the common good. Obviously they are not responsible for the pandemic, or the variants (although having a substantial section of the population unvaccinated does prolong things and thus gives time for new variants to evolve). Nevertheless they do deserve criticism and certainly shouldn't be pandered to. I can't think of anything positive to say about them, but I won't conflate the blame for mismanagement of Covid and the resulting impact on everyone with their stupidity. They are two different issues. You seem to think that its one or the other. We either blame the govt, and say nothing about those refusing the vaccine (tacitly accepting it as if its absolutely fine and not worthy of comment) or we blame the refuseniks, and accept the govt as having done a dandy job. No. That is precisely the problem with public discourse now - it's yes or no, plus or minus, positive or negative, 1 or 0. But the world is analogue, not digital! You should know better Phil.

Blissex said...

«the Tories have done since, except to note they have struggled (and largely succeeded) in reversing the axis of public health messaging»

With the eager complicity of New Labour's Keir Starmer, the SNP's Sturgeon, and the LibDem's Davey, who have kept quiet or endorsed the same approach to the epidemic and pretty much the same messaging, and even pretty much the same policies and results in New Labour's Wales and the SNP's Scotland.

A lot of people seem to forget that the Conservatives run health policy only in England.

Anonymous said...

ICUs are running at an average of 70 percent No Vax. That's a lot of people taking up a lot of capacity - and expense - unnecessarily. If it wasn't for them, health systems would be able to cope at this point. If it wasn't for No Vaxers maybe asymptomatic people etc wouldn't have to be quarantined as there wouldn't be the risk of health service collapse.

And it is hardly the UK that is 'scapegoating' No Vax - look at France, Germany, Italy, where it is now obligatory to get vaccinated over-50.

No one is pretending govts haven't made mistakes, but as Dr Zoltan says, this is not a binary discussion - it is possible to be critical of both.

I actually have sympathy with No Vaxers right to choose - but sadly the collective good now dictates (a good word that) societies can no longer tolerate this, especially within the limited resources of the public health system. If these people continue to expect the public to pick up their bill - let them pay.



Blissex said...

«conflate the blame for mismanagement of Covid and the resulting impact on everyone with their stupidity. They are two different issues. You seem to think that its one or the other. We either blame the govt, and say nothing about those refusing the vaccine (tacitly accepting it as if its absolutely fine and not worthy of comment) or we blame the refuseniks, and accept the govt as having done a dandy job.»

I think that this misunderstands the argument: the inconsistency that our blogger criticizes seems to me not that he excuses the novaxers and blames the government, and then blames novaxers and excuses the government, but:

* The government (plus Starmer and Sturgeon and Davey) have encouraged an individualistic, "fatalistic liberalism" approach to a contagious disease.

* At the same time they are scapegoating those whose who have taken an individualistic, "fatalistic liberalism" approach by not getting vaxed.

To me that is not an inconsistency: people are only encouraged to make an individualistic, "fatalistic liberalism" approach if that is to consume the expensive products marketed by "big pharma" "national champions" (note how the vaccines marketed by businesses from "unapproved" countries are never mentioned), so refusing those products is then scapegoated as "irresponsible".

It is nothing more than the praising "individualism" but only when it is the "individualism" of consumerism, that is the "individualism" that increases the sales of big business. And that is part of why I think the TTI approach has been rejected: not only it is "collectivist", but it does not make consuming products from big business the central "individualist" approach.

«That is precisely the problem with public discourse now - it's yes or no, plus or minus, positive or negative, 1 or 0. But the world is analogue, not digital!»

On that I very much agree, almost every valuable matter is a matter of degree and judgement.

Kamo said...

It wouldn't be so much of an issue if the anti-Vaxxers (those who could but won't have the vaccine, as opposed to those who medically can't) had the courage of their convictions and refused all medical intervention for Covid. Instead of monopolising ICU and other acute medical services they could find a quiet corner in which to have their reckoning with this illness, leaving the finite medical resources for those who actually take it seriously.