Graeme Currie, Labour's candidate in the seat these past three general elections has complained that he was barred from the shortlist by Labour's NEC. Graeme said "Under the guise of “due diligence” they raised spurious concerns regarding a tweet 2018 of a Palestinian badge and a Facebook post in 2020 where I quoted Jeremy Corbyn calling for calm following the Equalities Commission’s report on findings of Institutional anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. I consider I have been unjustly slurred as anti-Semitic." Graeme has indeed has his character impugned, but this is to be expected from a leadership that lies brazenly and has contracted out its policy on the Israeli occupation to the gentile-owned and directed Jewish Chronicle.
Two who did make it through to the selection were David Hallam and Ben Wood, the successful candidate. David is well known to West Midlands Labour members who've been around the block for a while. A stalwart of the old Labour right, he was an MEP for the WestMids region between 1994 and 1999 and was a victim of a Blairist clear out that dispensed with the services of other Labour MEPs, such as Christine Oddy (who subsequently stood as an independent) and Mike Tappin, who before and since had a career in Stoke's local politics. David went on to write several books and work as a press officer for WestMids regional office, being very much part of the rightwing/"Watsonite"/Labour First power base who survived the Corbyn interlude. His support for Iraq Body Count, which was based out of Keele University, and upsetting His Blairness in opposing the rewriting of Clause IV was as left wing as his politics got. Ben Wood, who hails from Oswestry, is very much the London candidate despite the local pedigree. Getting his break in Labour politics interning for Neil Coyle, as a youngster he did constituency work experience for the unlamented Owen Paterson. He currently works in the Lords for the opposition leader Angela Smith and chief whip Roy Kennedy as a special advisor.
Why the stitch up? With the Tory reversal in the polls, as the second placed party in 2019 and ahead of the Liberal Democrats by some distance, there is an outside chance Labour could scoop the seat. And if this was to be the case, there's no way Keir Starmer is running the risk of another leftwinger entering into parliament. Second, Ben was obviously the leadership's preferred candidate. He's young, relatively inexperienced, has climbed the university-intern-spad ladder like so many sitting Labour MPs, and shares their outlook and understanding of how politics works. And undoubtedly his bosses - both of whom attend Shadow Cabinet - would have put a good word in for him. By allowing David on the list, if Ben had come unstuck in the selection meeting having someone with good Labour First creds would be a consolation Starmer and co could live with. Whether having Graeme's story splashed all over the local paper already harms Labour's chances remains to be seen, but it certainly didn't help in Hartlepool.
The lesson here for the left? I don't know Graeme, but the NEC were able to easily sideline him because he did not possess sufficient institutional pull. Decades of activism and loyal service means nothing to these people. If Labour members are serious about contesting selections because they want to prosecute socialist politics and working class aspirations, it's going to take more than a spring clean of one's social media (besides, someone will have the receipts on everything any half-prominent local leftist has said online - there are a few amateur Stasi agents in every CLP). The only way of taking on the Labour machine and winning is if another machine is in your corner: trade union backing. It's much easier to dismiss an "isolated" leftwinger than someone who has strong and long-standing relationships with one or more of the big trade unions. In other words, North Shropshire was stitched up for political reasons, but also because Starmer and his NEC minions could do it. If staying and fighting means anything, it's about not letting them having their way easily.
Image Credit
25 comments:
The treatment of Howard Becket shows that having a big union behind you counts for very little in today's Labour Party.
The millionaire lawyer Beckett, with no record of rank and file involvement in Unite, was feted by idiots like 'Skwawkbox' and backed by Lennie McC, until (to their embarrassment) he stood down in favour of Steve Turner. I didn't back Sharon (I backed Turner), but atleast she's made it clear to this fake-left shyster that his career in Unite is over ... and, as a result, he's departed.
Mr Hallam did not have any real involvement in setting up the Iraq Body Count or any employment at Keele University- an ex friend of his did though.
So to summarise; a corrupt selection process that can be easily manipulated by corrupt individuals. If manipulated by the 'correct' corrupt individuals. This process can produce honest candidates with integrity & genuine socialist beliefs?
The reality is, nothing less than the complete destruction of the status quo (a corrupt labour party) can bring about any significant change.
Playing the type of games advocated by this article isn't, and never will be the solution.
Because only the worst individuals will triumph if being more corrupt than the other person is the key to success.
If staying and fighting means anything, it's about not letting them having their way easily.
What "staying and fighting" means has been much on my mind since I cancelled my annual DD to the party and was persuaded by local comrades to keep my membership going (monthly DDs now, though). So, what does "not letting them have their way" actually mean? Unless you can substantiate this - preferably with something else that Graeme Currie could actually have done - it just looks like victim-blaming and/or bull-headed voluntarism ("Stay and fight!" He did, and look what happened to him! "Stay and fight effectively!")
Vote Labour - go fuck yourself
Good article. Thanks for highlighting and calling out bad practice which, in reality does not serve the interests of the party.
Internal fights don't lead to a GE win. What was the point of excluding this candidate? Evidence? Could the party deal with real issues please we really don't have the time for this, not that is if we want to win. You could not make it up. Is this leadership- really.
Yes it does not serve the interests of getting the party elected well.
Can the Labour Party afford to act like this? I thought they were in opposition. Wasting time with nonsense.
As past Vice Chair , (2016 to 2019) of one of the two North Shropshire CLP branches, mine being Oswestry and District branch, of which Graeme Currie too was a branch member, I can confirm that Graeme was a very active member, mildly to the social democratic Left , a supporter of Jeremy as Leader, and the mildly Leftish turn of the Party since the 2015 Leadership win. I left the Party (again) after the quite obvious 'man from the Deep state', and Trilateral Commission creature, Starmer, became Leader . As did most of the Oswestry branch's small activist grouping of Leftwingers - most of whom , like myself, had only joined, or rejoined, after Jeremy's victory. Graeme stayed though , and had been a loyal fixture in the branch for decades, across so many ghastly Labour Leaders. The fact that a very mildly Leftish member like Graeme is now beyond the pale for the triumphant hubristic Labour Right just shows how far-reaching their collective ambition is to complete the unfinished Blair/Mandelson 'mission', to turn Labour into a simulcrum of the US Democrats , firmly pro neoliberal capitalist, totally run for the Parliamentary and council professional class elite, and eventually with members reduced merely to 'supporters'.
This strategy is certainly being pursued with ruthless zeal -- but it is of course electoral folly in the longer term. Yet another fully neoliberal , austerity-supporting Party will never win back the vital Scottish seats, and will have all the electoral appeal of a bucket of cold sick to the old Labour Heartland ex Labour voters. Its all over for Labour as a potential governing party, its 'PASOK moment' has actually come and gone. Electoral oblivion awaits . Any Left winger hanging on now is at best delusional, at worst a masochist .
The Labour Party are starting to sound as shoddy as the Conservatives.
When are we going to hear some good news about the LP. Can't even do a fair selection process. Really sick of this stuff if they cant get even get the basics right. If they don't even try what is the point.
Thanks for flagging up. Who do I vote for? The choice is a bit rubbish. No trust.
As a long time member of the Labour Party I am very sorry about what the party decided to do to Graeme Currie.
Bad as well as weak politics .
This 'practice' has gone on under different leaders from the so called 'right' and 'left' of the Labour Party for a long time. Mostly it is not useful to the party. It may serve at times a more powerful and better placed persons personal interest: friend or 'one of us' will vote the right way etc... Alas experience and indeed skill as a candidate often does not count.
Graeme Currie of course was very badly treated. I am also sorry about this. I voted for our present leader.
Who you know not what you know does not respect commitment.
His name is Graeme Currie.
What a bunch of shits.
Working full time and being even an active member of a trade union will not help you pull any strings. Having someone speaking up for you who is senior in a TU might- it has in the past within the Labour Party with seats.
I agree with the above statements regarding how they treated Graeme.
So after the stitch up is the Labour Party going to win? I would suggest they should focus their energy on being a real challenge.
The Tories know Boris is a liability. Labour may gain some traction at this point.
Labour did not gain either way from another 'stitch up'- however wasting and dividing political energy is never good idea for any political party.
Hi Phil,
I've just been reading an article from someone who's been interviewing in the constituency and it makes interesting reading.
How successful do you think the Greens have been in rural local councils and constituencies?
The Greens have done quite well this last year in by-elections in supposedly safe Tory areas. Looks like they're picking up the go-to destination mantle for protest voters in some parts of the country.
Might vote Green myself now- always been Labour before.
If Labour are in reality a lot of bastards what's the point of them? - They say they are for equal opportunities etc. but when they have some power this is what they do with it... and actually get very poor results.
Stupid bastards...Or a little group of self serving individuals at the helm?
Lost my vote.
Post a Comment