Friday, 14 August 2026

What Was the Point?

Across the land, grass has withered and died under the relentless glare of the burning sun. A climate catastrophe to be sure, but one that serves as an apt metaphor for the travails of Nigel Farage. At least as it exists in his and Reform's political imaginary. Instead of a drought, this was supposed to be Farage's evergreen summer. A hapless Prime Minister in office, racist pogroms to egg on and exploit, immigration to bang on about, and an establishment stitch up re: the parliamentary standards investigation to cry over. The master plan in forcing the by-election was about crushing the other parties, cementing Farage as the enfant terrible of British politics, and recapturing a sense of momentum - something that has been lacking, despite handily winning May's council elections in England and giving Labour a drubbing in the Senedd election. As we know, the one thing this elegant demonstration of 11-dimensional chess did not factor in was the refusal of his opponents to play ball. Instead, Clacton became an irrelevant sideshow of Farage vs a large field of "comedy" candidates, independents, and an oil slick of fascists hailing from tiny groupings and one-man bands. Small wonder he cried off giving a victory speech.

A Count Binface victory would have been funny, and driven a stake through Reform from which it would never recover. But this was never a serious proposition. On a reduced turnout of 44%, which is down on the general election but is roughly the kind of reduction one normally expects from a parliamentary by-election, Farage was able to poll 63.3% of the vote. An increase of just over a 1,000 ballots in raw vote terms on 2024, but proportionally a 17-point gain. Most politicians would be happy with that, but Reform's most enthusiastic supporters would have hoped for an even more emphatic win. Especially up against unorganised opposition and a cadre of joke candidates. Also interesting was the shrinkage of the right bloc in Clacton, as noted by Luke Tryl. It's almost as if their kind of politics are in long-term decline, or something. Count Binface also made history, ensuring immortality in the footnotes of political science journals. Not only was his 26.9% the highest ever polled by a spoof candidate in a UK parliamentary by-election, he's the first to hold on to his deposit.

On reacting to his win, Farage said the result "spoke for itself" and was open about not wanting to be pictured alongside his opponents. And then, because there's never not an opportunity to inject grievance politics, a Reform spox said Farage stayed away from the count after police had warned that there was a credible threat of disruption. Something Essex Police have denied.

What now? In the immortal words of Theresa May, nothing has changed. The standards investigation into Christopher Harborne's £5m "gift" restarts, which is likely to result in a suspension and another by-election in the Autumn. If Farage is going to quit politics for the quiet, lucrative life of right wing celebrity, this will be the moment. And the political atmosphere Reform now operate in is not as congenial. The Times-led investigations into the party's funding have severely dented Farage, and are subject to money laundering investigations by the police. Easy mode is no longer available to Farage and friends. They also have to adjust to life under Andy Burnham's premiership. Most polls are now posting modest Labour leads, and the government are gingerly talking about the good things they have done in office. The cost-of-living announcements over the last few weeks, while marginal in the scheme of things, do show a direction of travel to former Labour voters that they approve. On this, Reform has absolutely nothing to say and are out of sorts. This is compounded by Farage himself enjoying the most negative personal ratings of any party leader, and looking ever more shiftier in his efforts at dodging accountability. In all, the Clacton by-election was a waste of time and leaves Reform and Farage in a worse position.

Image Credit

4 comments:

Sean Dearg said...

Conversation overheard while at an arms fair:
"I was chatting to my PA on the PJ from Farnborough to Dubai about this sh*th*le by-election. 'For Tech's sake', I said, 'I didn't lob NF all that crypto so he could make a fool of himself by giving a bin a kicking on prime time.' 'Get me Tice, and tell him to get serious about being taken seriously.'
At this rate I'm going to run out of sycophantic rapacious loons ready to sell their souls, and the country, for some binary tokens. My PA reminded me that I'd said they were only useful as a distraction from my pillaging of what's left of the UK economy, so I sacked her. She wasn't wrong, but I don't pay people to have them remind me of my inconsistencies."
So, I guess the point was, distraction...

Anonymous said...

I wonder what the relative demographic sizes are for Mr Tryl's seven pigeonholes of the voting public. He seems to have one category for everyone left of centre, five for the centre and right, one for people who only vote against parties that have ever been in government, and none for single-issue racist voters. Even though the latter definitely do exist. Looks like they're politely but extremely disengenously characterised as "patriots" in Tryl's world.

Anonymous said...

As some political scientists have gone on record lately as saying about Nigel's woes: politicians in certain sectors of the political compass tend to greatly underestimate the extent to which their own voters actually DO care about matters of propriety and morals, such as not being openly and brazenly corrupt, to say nothing of being openly and brazenly incompetent.

Meanwhile, and on a related note... quite a lot of people are far more shocked right now by the ultimate fate of poor Professor Arday than they are by the accusations which were used to relentlessly hound him on the front pages.

Might be a good time to draw attention to exactly who it was who had it in for him - a matter of public record, since even some of the BBC coverage reported it (albeit somewhat buried).

There's a general need for the wider public to become wise to the fact that when you allow people with backwards social views to amass stratospheric wealth (and beyond), then they will use big chunks of that wealth to promote their own backwards social views, in all sorts of underhand and frankly despicable ways. Such as empowering smaller fish with similar views to pursue personal vendettas as a full time job.

McIntosh said...

Seems people read into the by-election result their pre-existing opinion. If you are a Reform supporter it is a ringing endorsement of Farage the honourable politician; if you don't like Reform it is a fiasco for them.
It may be that it is still too early to judge what impact the light, partial media barrage Farage is facing is having on the Reform vote. Despite the Burnham bounce of a few % Reform are still at around 24% - and Burnham's bounce may be like an unredeemed cheque sent back to Labour because of lack of substance in the not too distant future.
If there is another Clacton by-election and the heritage parties stand and Reform still win then we will be better able to draw conclusions - and consider where we might emigrate to.