Sunday, 8 February 2026

A Farewell to Morgan McSweeney

What a fantastic week. Peter Mandelson toasted to charcoal, the government being forced to make public all communications about him, the possibility of massive reputational damage hitting Wes Streeting when private messages between the pair come out, and capping it off Morgan McSweeney falls on his sword. Rare are the times when the doings of the worst people in politics catches up with them, but this is one such spectacular occasion.

It's not true that McSweeney was the most malignant presence in the contemporary Labour Party, because we found out that he willingly, happily had his strings pulled by Mandelson. We've learned that Uncle Peter had a hand in nodding through and barring candidates for selection ahead of the general election, displaying the customary contempt for data protection laws that the Labour right normally has for their own party rules. And that Mandelson effectively reshuffled the cabinet after Angela Rayner's departure, ensuring a leadership team more right wing and authoritarian than anything Mandelson had a hand in during the New Labour years.

That McSweeney, like large chunks of the Labour right, lionised Mandelson is common knowledge, but why? As argued here previously, McSweeney is no genius, and was only ever an "operator" when he was secure in a position of unaccountable power. McSweeney was Mandelson's apprentice, and only ever approached his master in cynicism and mendacity. His actual achievements are somewhat lesser, and among them one can count hollowing Labour out before it entered government, relying on antipathy to the Tories and the split right wing vote to win an election, and securing a weaker public endorsement than Jeremy Corbyn managed in 2019. It is under his direction that the party's support has eroded to a historical nadir, to the point where Labour's actual liquidation is on the cards, and McSweeney's relentlessly racist push on immigration has boosted the extreme right.

Obviously, none of this happened without the nod from Uncle Peter. But there is a significant difference between the two. Mandelson, like Blair and Gordon Brown, were political. Working their way up and through the party in the 1980s demanded skill, of knowing the balance of factions, the importance of the unions, the strength of the fiefdoms in the apparat, how to play to constituency parties and, where necessary, deploy political arguments to secure quiescence from opponents and find new allies. This isn't to say Labour was a nice place, far from it. But it was an institution that was significantly more than a bureaucracy for organising campaigning teams, which is what the party has become. New Labour was not inevitable, and Blair, Brown, and Mandelson had to win political fights to win the leadership and push it further to the right. The problem was they created a desert and called it peace. By battling and clearing out the left, and reducing trade unions to piggy banks that would occasionally complain but never rock the boat, successive generations of councillors, MPs, internal office seekers, and party full-timers came of age when the party was becalmed. Even in the Iraq War did little to nothing to challenge the leadership's writ.

This was the Labour Party McSweeney joined in 2001. He did the unglamorous hard yards of carrying bags, drawing up countless road groups, knocking on doors, all the things that party campaigning staff are expected to do. And, as we know, he organised campaigns too. But internal struggle? He undoubtedly listened to what Mandelson told him, heard all the stories of 1980s shenanigans from the John Spellar/constituency bore wing of the party. There will be a copy of John Golding's The Hammer of the Left lying around somewhere, but he never actually lived it. And that showed when the 2015 Labour leadership election rolled around, and his campaign - the Liz Kendall effort - mustered only four per cent of the vote. He, nor Kendall, hadn't realised that New Labourism had no base in the party outside of sections of the PLP, the bureaucracy, and the leaders' offices of a couple of tame unions. The lesson McSweeney took from this was not to wage a political struggle to make these positions popular, as the evidence of his own eyes showed he was completely clueless on this front. Instead, to defeat the left and return Labour back to its rightful professional/managerial leadership cadre, there was only one thing for it: lying.

If McSweeney has a genuine talent, it's as a con man. Because McSweeney and mates couldn't resist telling all and sundry about how clever he was, we know he ran Labour Together as a Janus-faced operation. Outwardly a soft left can't-we-all-just-get-along kumbya outfit, in reality it was a front for organising hit jobs on left wingers, left wing publications, of providing friendly media with copy targetting party members and the leadership, and once Corbyn was gone it, despite denials, ran Keir Starmer's leadership campaign - a confidence trick in which every single one of his pledges turned out to be a lie. And once McSweeney was at the top of the tree, the power of the bureaucracy was turned against the left. No persuasion, no alliance-building across party constituencies. Nothing but a petty-minded, vindictive pursuit of real and imagined enemies. There was never anything "genius" about any of this. Wielding power against the small and weak is the easiest thing in the world.

The rest is history. They say that if you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies come floating past. Many people across the labour movement have waited decades for Mandelson's cadaver to bob along with the current. And dragged in his wake is the fast festering foulness of McSweeney's former career. But unfortunately for the survivors of this last week, the damage these pair have done is so great, the dispersion of their natural constituency and core support so advanced, that something else is teetering on the bank further upstream and looks certain to topple into the water. And that is the swaying, barely-living figure of the Labour Party itself.

Image Credit

9 comments:

dermot said...

Indescribable to see (hopefully) Starmer not just resign, but to resign in disgrace. I'm holding out hope that he goes in the next ~35 days, which will make him a shorter tenure than Sunak, but if he does hold on to May he'll help drive labour closer to obliteration, which will also be gravy.
In a just world, this lot's worst day wouldn't be resignation, it would be arrest and prosecution. Give them their day in court.

Anonymous said...

Excellent read. I enjoyed that. Starmer is finished. He was already the most unpopular PM and Labour leader in history, with the party as a whole staring decimation in voter preference polling. And all this before the man, the politician, the PM no less, whose calm, sober, forensic, 'adult in the room' brand helped get him into power, along with a pageant of lies, decided it quite proper to ignore all publicly available warnings and employ a notorious industrial scale international paedophile rings wannabe best friend to the most prestigious diplomatic post Britain has to offer. Starmer's cadaver is merely obscured from view, caught in weeds on the other side of the bank. The shortly arriving storm will flood the river and he'll be dislodged. Possibly even by other party bodies. A criminal investigation of Mandelson must be allowed to proceed unemcumbered by cabinet office manipulation. It would be Starmer's last and only good deed for the country.

Anonymous said...

The ghastly creature , Starmer, could indeed go because of this scandal. Not of course because he is overseeing the UK's ongoing direct assistance to the Gaza genocide, but because the whole corrupt (but in relative terms to an ongoing genocide, miniscule in importance) Mandelson/Epstein farrago (covered in Private Eye for decades , and ignore by the MSM till now) has suddenly "reached its moment ".

I'm not entirely sure Starmer will actually fall though, because as a member of the Trilateral Commission and a long term US State Department creature , he has powerful friends - and the alternative Labour Right Leadership contenders are simply so utterly crap to be useful rebuilders of New Labour's electoral fortunes. Labour has reached its "PASOK" moment of collapse now , and even a total faker like Andy Burnham can't save it electorally.

Sean Dearg said...

While schadenfreude can be enjoyable, it isn't healthy. I am glad to see the back of MacSweeny, and I will be happy when Starmer falls, as he surely will, but where does it leave UK politics? Labour and Tories are zombie parties, staggering along, slavering, biting, desperate to eat the brains of anyone they encounter. Reform are the party of Dracula - rampaging across the countryside looking for blood. The Lib Dems are clinging to a vestige of respectability because they are seen as mostly harmless, but in truth they offer very little other than a slightly less obviously self-interested clique of corporate hangers on.
All that leaves us is Zack and the Greens. But can they survive the onslaught that will hit them if they become genuine contenders?
Our politics is rancid and rotten and needs complete change from top to bottom, from elecoral system to constitution via both houses and local government. Everything needs to be redesigned to make it responsive to the population rather than to wealth and all its infections. We need participative, truly democratic and transparent governance. We also need to make deliberately misleading the public an offence with serious consequences - for platform owners as well as politicians.

McIntosh said...

The tracing of the rise and ( first)fall of the Genius shows some of the underlying pillars of a liberal theory of history. First, the great man theory of success. A genius - Napoleon, Alexander, Trotsky - is needed to move history forward. It is not social forces and societal changes that led to Labour's victories but a great man with irresistable ideas and actions.
Second, the 'a big boy did it and ran away' explanation of how thing go wrong. In this case two 'big boy' geniuses, Mandelson and McSweeney, led astray decent, honourable people, Blair, Brown, Starmer. Not that they were all complicit and shared the same views.
Third, once you are described as a genius by the political reporters you hold the title for ever. Afterall, the reporters have decided between themselves that you are one so they don't want to undermine their insight and analysis. Doesn't matter that McSweeny and Starmar's Manifesto had no substance or plans to deliver and that almost every major announcement had to be revised.
It will now be fascinating and alarming to see how and where the Genius re-emerges. He is not yet 50 and seems to lack any self critical facility or modesty so presumably will be seeking opportunites to conquer new worlds.

Anonymous said...

The main hope for Starmer - unless he resigns - is that there does not seem to be a contender in the Labour ranks to challenge him. Reeves is soiled by her budgets, Rayner has some tax issues to resolve, Streeting knows Mandelson too well, Cooper and Kendal have had a go before, McFadden and Lammmy ha, ha, ha, bomber Healey would not get the membership vote nor would Phillipson or Mamood, Alexander is glib but likely to lose his seat at an election to the SNP so you are left with the arch zionist Reed or Darren Jones or Jonathan Reynolds or Kyle - not the material to turn things round or stop the rot.
So, it looks like another relaunch will be needed to turn the corner and keep the 'honourable man' (So they are all, all honourable men) until a new Starmer can be found.

Anonymous said...

The Epstein affair and the Gaza genocide are not necessarily independent. Netanyahu is all over those files, as I understand it.

Anonymous said...

A new Starmer wouldn't help them at all. Even if the "new Starmer" had all the very limited electoral charm of Starmer in 2020, as opposed to the even more limited charm of Starmer in 2026, they'd still be facing wipeout at the next GE, because their 2024 result was entirely gifted by the Tories.

Unless they break with New Labourism entirely the Party is finished. And since the remaining tentacles of New Labour will never again give up control of the Party until their death-grip is dismantled atom by atom, a clean break from New Labourism is impossible... and the Party is therefore finished.

If Labour MPs with genuine values want to keep their seats, a ship jump to the Green Party beckons, as the next GE looks certain to be Lib Dems and Greens versus the national suicide party.

Anonymous said...

Cannot see anything but a new Starmer emerging as leader. Mandelson and McSweeny's selection of candidates in 2024 means that the LP is full of them. They all seem to look like the Mormon missionaries that knock your door to offer you entry to the kindom of heaven, or US Baptist pastors who warn you that the end of times is nigh if you don't give them a donation and change your ways.