Wednesday, 7 May 2025

Zack Polanski's Green-Left Populism

Zack Polanski's announcement that he's standing for the leadership of the Green Party has set the hares racing. Over the last couple of days, he's done the rounds of left media, had write ups in the Graun, and - predictably - attracted hostile commentary from the right wing Jewish Chronicle and Jewish News. My Bluesky feed, which heavily leans on left and progressive-types has witnessed an outpouring of support and not a few signing up to the Greens to back his candidacy. Could it be that we're finally seeing something positive happening on the left?

There's certainly the space for it. For a variety of reasons, which you can put down to sectarianism, foot dragging, and the continued fealty to Labour on the part of those MPs who've already been chucked out of the party, there is a void to Labour's left dying to be filled. So wide it is that even Nigel Farage has said opportunist things about nationalising steel and liking trade unions. Therefore, as a socially liberal party that has been pushing a radical left platform for a while now, it would be a dereliction of political duty to not tread where Jeremy Corbyn and the independents and sort-of groups around him fear to go.

What has ben encouraging about Polanski's pitch is a recognition of the Green's weaknesses and the kind of politics that have to be pushed to wrest the radical mantle away from the extreme right. He says the Green Party is "too nice", which reflects dominant sections of its base among the middle class. I.e. Professionals and the highly educated, tending to cluster in the public and third sectors. The moment however demands a left populism that centres wedge issues around class, inequality, wealth, and environmentalism. You might say an approach owing more to Marx than Malthus. And there is an appetite for this politics. On a larger scale, Corbynism has twice demonstrated it has more popular appeal than Starmerism at its height, and so there is a constituency for the taking. Next year's metropolitan local elections across Labour strongholds are going to be very interesting.

The question is can the Greens become the left alternative if Polanski wins the leadership? One can look around at the, to put things euphemistically, patchy record of the party's co-thinkers across the continent. In the UK, Brighton council, Mid-Suffolk council, and the Greens' performance in the Scottish government hardly heralded red dawns. But neither were they worse than your average Labour council, for whom attacking workers and slashing services have long been the norm - even before the Tory/Liberal Democrat coalition imposed ruinous cuts on local government after 2011. The alternative path away from that trod by establishment green parties is that taken by the green-left parties of Denmark, the Netherlands, and the Nordic Green-Left Alliance. There are no insurmountable reasons why taking a Scandinavian turn is impossible.

But there are two difficulties an explicitly left wing party faces. The first can be more or less ignored, and that's the scepticism many on the established left - your writer included - has toward political organisations not explicitly based on class. This is unlikely to prove an electoral obstacle, but puts a ceiling on the numbers of established left wing activists a Polanski-led Green Party can attract. Though, to be honest, he's not waiting around for any of their approvals. Perhaps the politics of the electoral deed might sway them. The second is more substantial: the Greens' non-radical wing. This is best represented by the local government inroads made before Reform was anointed the establishment's anti-establishment party of choice, and was recently highlighted when current co-leader Adrian Ramsey went off-script in an interview with the BBC's Nick Robinson and equivocated instead of pushing the party position on trans issues. There is a possibility that some of this layer could do a reverse Polanski and move from the Greens to the Lib Dems.

That said, there is undoubtedly a prize to be seized. With the extra-Labour left unwilling to move beyond marches and rallies, a radical Green Party that speaks to the interests of the rising class of workers, reflects the dominant socially liberal outlook of tens of millions, and is starkly posed as an alternative to the extreme right and what Labour are selling, could chime with the vibes of the moment and build that elusive left-populist insurgency this country's politics has so far lacked. Therefore, while I won't be joining the Greens, there's a good chance the tidal surge of a Polanski leadership could lift all our boats.

Image Credit

17 comments:

"Big Balls" Starmer said...

Don't be a muggins. Don't support false flag Zack. He's a long-time Corbyn hater, an ex Lib Dem, and a hard-line IHRA enthusiast.

A phoney. An opportunist. Another (silent-on-Gaza) Lansman.

Why are socialists so naive?

Anonymous said...

That reference to "the right wing Jewish press" at the start comes across very badly (whatever your attention was). I didn't expect to read that kind of thing on this blog.

Phil said...

We're talking about the Jewish Chronicle and the Jewish News. That you took it in another direction says more about you than me.

Phil said...

It's probably worthwhile to engage with his politics as they actually are as opposed to what you think they are.

Anonymous said...

It is really depressing seeing comrades on the left who should know better - I’m not including the author of the blog in this - handing over their wallets to be inspected by someone who was a Lib Dem in the Tory coalition years and only later defected to the Greens at the age of 32 or 33 in 2016 or 2017 because they couldn’t get selected as a candidate for the Lib Dems in a winnable seat, and is now trying to cynically manipulate those who supported Corbynism by posturing as an “eco-populist” despite the fact that he previously attacked and smeared Corbyn and his supporters.

Tommy Baldwin said...

As Alexei Sayle satirically commented about the Green Party: Lib Dems on bicycles.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for writing Phil - are there any stand out reasons why you "won't be joining"?

Kamo said...

It's all irrelevant anyway, the Green Party's reluctance to engage pragmatism over ideological purity on the issues that are most salient with large chunks of the population limits what they can ever achieve regardless of leadership. I see these comparisons with Reform, how they can be the left-wing populists, but the problem is they whilst they may indulge in magical thinking like Reform do, Reform tend to offer unlikely or unrealistic solutions to obvious problems, the Green offering is to pretend they're not actually problems (to use techie parlance they are features rather than bugs). I don't see the Green Party as too nice, they might not have the 'grifter' vibe you get from Reform figures, but they definitely have the same 'I'm alright Jack' attitude you get from comfortable middle class people who don't actually concern themselves with true working class* experience.

* Working class in it's old fashioned meaning; what Marx would have called proletariat.

Anonymous said...

To the commenters... let's not be beautiful souls, lamenting purity of purpose. I thought he was pretty good recently on Novara's pods about the idea of a new party. In any case, a movement of electoral left populism from an established party will undercut Mcsweeney's assumption of simply taking the left vote for granted when the chips are down and the front is up.

Anonymous said...

In the absence of any serious new left wing party, what would you have people do? Vote for McSweeney's Labour?

If people flock to the Greens under Polanski, at the very least it shows anyone who might found a new left party, that there is an appetite for it.

"Big Balls" Starmer said...

Yep. The guy's a complete phoney. Just look at this evil nonsense:

https://medium.com/@ZackPolanski/green-party-anti-semitism-what-exactly-happened-at-conference-9ad1d047e3cf

All you have to do is Google the guy's name to see him for what he is.

Anonymous said...

Agree, as an enthusiast for the International Hot Rod Association I don't see how he can possibly call himself a Green...

dermot said...

Alexei Sayle's quoted remark about the Greens above "LibDems on Bikes" has a harder version in Ireland, where we've had the misfortune of not one but two Green spells in coalition government (with one or both of our right wing Austerity parties):

"Blueshirts on Bikes".

Blueshirts being the 1930s funny arm gesture enthusiasts, as our modern media pundits would probably describe them.

Alex said...

So if I Google "Zack Polanski gaza" I get this: https://bylinetimes.com/2025/01/21/met-police-accused-of-lying-about-planned-gaza-protest-at-the-bbc/

In which he was speaking and matching at a gaza protest, and complains about the met blocking it. Did "Big balls" actually do the search, or did he just assume based on Polanski being Jewish?

Stuart's blog said...

Not convinced. Opportunist who once he gets the vote - if - he'll accede to the system. A weak iteration using the platform of the greens to gain some credence in the midst of a rising right wing vote. There's better if people want something outside the parliamentary dogmatism

Anonymous said...

Why are the greens suddenly more noticeable or noteworthy because of this guy?

Is it because he's controversial?

Anonymous said...

I have a good knowledge of the Green Party and dont agree with the analysis that Zack is the left wing candidate. I also dont agree that him being leader will lead to people joining the Lib dems. Contaminating the Left with the ideas of the far-right represents a massive deafeat for decency. it might be that the only way to beat Farage eg is to operate as they do but could the left lose its soul,