Pages

Sunday, 20 September 2009

Advertising Their Hypocrisy

I recycle religiously. I use public transport all the time. I refuse to use standby buttons. I never jet off to sunnier climes. I try to minimise waste whenever I can. In all I'm the very model of the ecological citizen - most greens would kill for my dainty carbon footprint. And for this reason I'm pissed off at this example of conspicuous waste:
The first video advert inside a print title has been published inside the American magazine Entertainment Weekly. The small screen, built into a cardboard insert, contains an advert for Pepsi Max and trailers for US TV network, CBS. There are also in-built speakers, so the viewer can hear the advert too. "This is an extraordinary way to refresh how we interact with consumers," said Pepsi-Cola's chief marketing officer, Frank Cooper. (Story)
Frank Cooper is an idiot in need of a dictionary. Making a commercial extolling the virtues of Pepsi Max is not interaction. That has to be a two-way thing, duh.

But the waste of this enterprise eclipses Pepsi's moronic newspeak. It might only go out on a print run limited to a few thousand of
Entertainment Weekly's subscribers, but the marketing gurus at Pepsi and CBS will be looking for a repeat once the costs have come down (at $20 per magazine, this doesn't come cheap). The raw materials, the manufacturing capacity, the pollutants and emissions, all for something completely unnecessary and useless.

Where does this leave the
Pepsi Eco Challenge and CBS Cares? You know, their pledges and calls to meet "the challenge of environmental stewardship" and "help protect the environment - our children depend on it"?

Looking like corporate greenwash bollocks, that's what.

6 comments:

  1. That's one of the greatest examples of dumbassery I've seen in a long time!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good grief, that is massive waste and excess even by modern standards.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If they think it will turn them a profit then why would they even care what the environmental impact is? "corporate greenwash bollocks" indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. this is insane, imagine having an advert in a magazine,it'd do your head in! It reminds of me the crazy advertising used in minority report, well maybe not quite that extreme.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I want to know does the mag now come under the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE)?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you know that an anagram of A Very Public Sociologist is Spoilt Vigorous Celibacy?

    I hope that's not off topic in any way...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are under moderation.