Pages

Monday, 3 November 2025

Nigel Farage's Tory Economics

That Nigel Farage, he's proven himself a dab hand at politics. Having replaced the Conservatives as the main party of the right, at least in the opinion polls, he said he was coming for Labour. And a number's been done on them too. Their figures are the worst ever while Keir Starmer's personal ratings sit somewhere between Liz Truss's and Vladimir Putin's. Even more unbelievably, it's only recently that the very clever politics brains the Prime Minister employs have come to the conclusion that challenging Farage's politics might be a good idea. Having spent the last few years caving to his framing. The result? Farage riding high on a bubble of popular support. Sure, Reform are stealing a march on the politics of anti-immigration and race, but can they convince as many people that they - the party that successfully defended the sovereignty of sterling - care about the pounds in their pockets?

It's telling, but not surprising that the champion of Brexit chose the City as the venue for his big economics speech. The symbolism will not be lost on the oligarchs who are now assessing Farage's suitability as the political custodian of their interests. And it's these people, not the downtrodden little men that comprise his usual audience, he wanted to address. The most eye-catching item in his list of promises was not the rowing back of the ridiculous tax cuts promised previously ("they were only ever aspirations"), but his desire to put the screws on young people. "The minimum wage is too high", and poor businesses are suffering. Cutting it would boost aspiration. Either that, or employers' National Insurance Contributions should be cut by lifting the cap at which they should be paid. It's a good job Reform's imaginary army of enthusiastic young people are imaginary, otherwise they would be in the process of evaporating.

Farage said he would abolish George Osborne's - and now Labour's child benefit cap. But only for British nationals, and only if both parents were working. In other words, those most in need would lose out. He also wouldn't be drawn on whether to keep the triple lock on pensions, which usually indicates that yes, they are thinking of tinkering with it in some way. A reminder that the state pension here is still weaker than it is in Ireland, Germany, France, Denmark, etc despite the upratings the lock has delivered these last 15 years. While we're on pensions, having consumed many a Telegraph editorial, Farage thinks he can clamp down on spending by attacking the "gold plated" schemes public sector workers apparently enjoy. Also, disabilities are "over-diagnosed", so more penny pinching and cruelty is being plotted against the most vulnerable people in our communities.

Gruel for the little people. But treats for the rich. The pledge to reverse Labour's land tax on the rural rich made the cut, as did a promise to abolish inheritance tax on family-owned businesses. He argued that Britain operates a punitive tax regime that drives successful people abroad. Out of the ether, he pulled the example of £100k/year "young professionals" leaving these shores. He knew none of his adoring stenographers would ask him how those fleeing abroad would take those jobs with them. There were the ritual assaults on net zero, and he took aim at diversity and inclusion policies. Recalling his time as a metals trader during the 1980s, he said no one cared about race, religion, or gender on the famously diverse commodities floor. There were, after all, blond white men, bald white men, dark haired white men.

What is striking about his speech is the dropping of anything approaching the populism, however you define it. Farage has made a solemn vow that regardless of the rhetoric and the chaos, he has no plans whatsoever to reshape Britain's political economy. Which isn't a surprise, seeing as his party are as much affected by the crisis in mainstream politics as the rest. What he presented is pure and simple Tory economics, a programme openly dedicated not to driving GDP growth, increasing employment, and doing the things responsible helmsmen of British capitalism are supposed to do. This is the economics of strengthening class relations by throwing more people off social security and onto the job market without support, while driving down the wages and conditions of young people who subsist on the minimum wage. It's not difficult to work out who benefits from this. The political of Farage's economy also owes more to the miserly managerialism of Rishi Sunak than the bombast of fellow "populist" Boris Johnson. As per the last Tory government, Farage is promising a smaller state not to meet his ideological peccadilloes but to try and manage the politics. People demand less if the state is underfunded, run down, and barely works. For all intents and purposes, Farage has stolen the Conservatives' prospectus. Reform is set on becoming a Tory home from home.

At the same time, this leaves Farage vulnerable. We've seen in recent weeks that overt racism can damage Reform. Most of the public aren't on board with his anti-Net Zero drivel, and Farage's murky finances and penchant for Russian talking points are hanging round his neck like a 300lb albatross. This City speech is also a political liability, as he unambiguously paints which side he is on. And it's not the one most of his support think it is. Pathetically, both Labour and the Tories have attacked his plans as "unworkable" and spun a weave of boring, technocratic reasons why they won't work. But Farage has made himself uncharacteristically vulnerable by painting a target on his rather large weak spot. He's conceded populist ground where, should they choose, the Greens, the left, and the labour movement can have him.

Image Credit

Sunday, 2 November 2025

Exiling Andrew

How was your week? It probably wasn't as bad as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's. Gone are his titles and honorifics, his position in the royal family, the imprimatur of the British establishment, and his 30-room grace-and-favour "lodge". He remains, for now, in the line of succession but the purge of Andrew is every bit as efficient as the deletion of problem DJs and celebrities of yesteryear from the BBC archive. All that remains is his vice-admiralty of the Royal Navy, and its days are numbered. According to the Sunday papers, a half-million pay off, an annual stipend from the King, and accommodation out of the public eye on the Sandringham estate is the shape of his exile. As crushing this is for him, there wouldn't be many people who would sniff at these spoils of disgrace.

It was oft-noted while the Queen was alive that she was ruthless in preserving the family firm, but this goes beyond her treatment of Diana, Sarah Ferguson, and the well-publicised fallings outs and failed reconciliations with Prince Harry. Andrew, somewhat protected by his mother's most-favoured-son status is not so indulged by big brother. His sacking and disowning is almost on par with the expulsion of Edward VIII/the Duke of Windsor 90 years ago, though hopefully Andrew won't further embarrass his family by cosying up to fascists.

There has been unanimity between the King and the leaders of his most loyal political parties during Andrew's filleting. For Keir Starmer, being seen to back tough measures against Andrew will, he hopes, bury memories of Peter Mandelson and his unfortunate Jeffrey Epstein connections. And for Kemi Badenoch, the Tories still have to pretend their political standing matches their constitutional relevance. More importantly, they are one because Andrew's relationship to Epstein and the harrowing allegations levied by Virginia Giuffre was a blot on an institution already on the skids, and further embarrassments were likely. There have been lurid stories about Andrew's sexual escapades while working as an overseas trade envoy, dodgy business transactions, and unhelpful questions over his murky income arrangements. And there is the drip, drip of further revelations. Like uncomfortable emails, and more secrets ready to spill from the Epstein files.

The King was not prepared to tough any of this out, and so for the family's greater legitimacy much water needed putting between the royal household and Andrew. The thoroughness of the break is demonstrative of Charles III's seriousness of purpose. Getting pictured with an alleged sex offender at family gatherings or on the palace balcony would tarnish by association, and raise questions about how much the King and golden boy Prince William knew, and when. Likewise, for the mainstream parties, with their reputation and political roles in abject crisis, there was no question of them not rallying around the crown and endorsing the King's tough measures.

What does this unwelcome episode for our sovereign tell us? That, unlike his Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition, he is aware of the monarchy's precarity and has a firm grasp on public opinion. Certainly more so than dear m'ma. But this is an institution in retreat. Defending it by offloading a liability is quite easy, if personally painful. The challenge is winning over new support and securing the future. An altogether much harder task.

Image Credit

Saturday, 1 November 2025

Local Council By-Elections October 2025

This month saw 79,149 votes cast in 35 local authority contests. All percentages are rounded to the nearest single decimal place. 24(!) council seats changed hands. For comparison with September's results, see here.

Party
Number of Candidates
Total Vote
%
+/- Sep
+/- Oct 24
Avge/
Contest
+/-
Seats
Conservative
          37
12,544
    15.8%
  +0.5
    -11.6
   339
    -6
Labour
          30
 9,904
    12.5%
   -1.9
      -9.9
   330
    -6
Lib Dem
          36
19,722
    24.9%
  +8.7
     +3.7
   548
   +8
Reform
          37
23,414
    29.6%
  +3.7
   +24.2
   633
 +10
Green
          29
 6,336
     8.0%
   -5.7
      -3.0
   218
    -1
SNP*
           2
 1,598
     2.0%
  +0.4
      -2.0
   799
     0
PC**
           0
   
     
   
     
   
     0
Ind***
          25
 3,940
     5.0%
   -4.5
     +0.1
   158
    -5
Other****
           7
 1,691
     2.1%
  +1.3
      -0.2
   242
     0


* There were two by-elections in Scotland
** There were no by-elections in Wales
*** There were six Independent clashes
**** Others this month were Caterham Residents (131), Guildford Residents (565), Heritage Party (97), Our West Lancashire (704), Rejoin EU (81), Tunbridge Wells Alliance (105), TUSC (8)

Congratulations to the Labour Party. This is the first time since last November that they didn't come bottom of the month's contest. Instead, they got to share that ignominy with the Conservatives. Losing six seats apiece, Reform and the Liberal Democrats surged. The former the catch-all protest party, as heavily trailed by the media. The latter, it seems, tha catch-all tactical choice to keep Reform from winning.

October was also notable because for the third time ever, Reform lost a seat defence. The Lib Dems scooped one up from them in Bromsgrove. But before there are any celebrations, the yellow party dropped one to them near Ipswich. No sign of the tide going out for Reform yet, despite its well-publicised difficulties in local government.

Is November likely to tell a different story? It's possible the Tories could do worse than Labour, but things being as they are this month will look like last month, and all the months of the past year.

2 October
Brentwood, Hutton South, Ref gain from Con
Cheshire West & Chester, Strawberry, Lab hold
Isle of Wight, Lake North, Ref hold
Maidstone, Harrietsham Lenham & North Downs, Ref gain from Ind x3
Wigan, Wigan Central, Ref gain from Lab

8 October
Hart, Yateley West, LDem hold

9 October
Bath & North East Somerset, Widcombe & Lyncombe, LDem hold
North Northamptonshire, Lloyds & Corby Village, Ref hold
Redcar & Cleveland, Skelton East, Ref gain from Con
Teignbridge, Kenn Valley, LDem gain from Con
West Lancashire, Aughton & Holborn, Oth gain from Lab
Wychavon, Bretforton & Offerton, Ref gain from Con

16 October
Babergh, Copdock & Washbrook, Ref gain from LDem
Preston, Ashton, LDem gain from Lab
Reigate & Banstead, Meadvale & St John's, LDem hold
South Ayrshire, Ayr North, Ind gain from SNP
Spelthorne, Staines, LDem gain from Grn
Surrey, Camberley West, LDem gain from Con
Surrey, Caterham Valley, LDem hold
Surrey, Guildford South East, LDem gain from Oth
Tandridge, Whyteleafe, LDem hold
Trafford, Broadheath, Con gain from Lab

23 October
Birmingham, Moseley, LDem gain from Lab
Colchester, New Town & Christ Church, Lab hold
Fenland, Whittlesey North West, Con hold
Portsmouth, Paulsgrove, Ref gain from Ind
Somerset, Dunster, LDem gain from Con
Somerset, Glastonbury, LDem hold
Torridge, Milton & Tamarside, LDem gain from Ind

30 October
Barnet, Hendon, Con hold
Stevenage, Roebuck, Ref gain from Lab
Stirling, Stirling East, SNP gain from Con
Thanet, Garlinge, Ref gain from Ind
Tunbridge Wells, St Johns, LDem hold
Worcestershire, Bromsgrove South, LDem gain from Ref

Image Credit

Five Most Popular Posts in October

Did you get mugged by costume-clad kids last night? Don't worry, I have some post-Halloween treats for you: what was hot in October as decided by the internet going public.

1. Uncovering Starmer's Fraudulent Politics
2. What about the Little Lenins?
3. What Happened to One Nation Conservatism?
4. Politics after Caerphilly
5. Racism and the Right

Coming out on top was my right up of Paul Holden's press conference about his new book, The Fraud. It contained detailed and evidenced claims about the dirty tricks and the law flouting that has attended Keir Starmer's rise to and leadership of Labour. Mr Rules indeed. Second was a meditation on the far left and what role for them in Your Party. I see from reports around the country that the SWP have shown themselves keen to run events themselves, up to and excluding others from any organising role. Even so, I still wouldn't favour banning them from the new party. In at three as my thinking about one nation conservatism, a philosophy and attitude long departed from the Tory party as it exists today. Four was the fall out of Labour's catastrophic loss of their Caerphilly seat for the Senedd. Are there any signs that they recognise the roots of their malaise? Nope. And coming up last is a foray into considerations around the shape of hegemony in Britain today. What does Sarah Pochin's racist "outburst" say about the state of elite politics?

The post selected for the second chance promo treatment is The Second Green Surge. Has Your Party missed the boat with dithering and infighting? What's powering the rapid growth of the Greens? Is it just because Zack Polanski is a dab hand at the social media?

The unwelcome intrusion of Covid meant I didn't write quite as much as I hoped in October. But for the first time in a long time, I'm feeling motivated - even if politics is still a bin fire. Bubbling under I've got more things I want to say about the Greens, about Your Party, and what's going on with the Labour Party. Is it too caught in the grip of a process of long-term decline just like the Tories? I want to throw down some more thoughts about the debates around hegemony/anti-hegemony, and something might appear about our old chum Jean Baudrillard. On top of that the usual commentary on events, dear boy will populate this blog. As ever, if you haven't already don't forget to follow the (very) occasional newsletter, and if you like what I do (and you're not skint), you can bung a few quid and help support the blog. Following me on Bluesky, Facebook, and for what it's worth, Twitter, are cost-free ways of showing your backing for this corner of the internet.

Image Credit